The US has entered the Israel-Iran war. However, despite an initial 4 per cent surge on the open, oil has settled where it has been since the conflict began in early June — around US$72 to US$75 a barrel.Trump claims the attacks from the US on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend are a very short, very tactical, one-off. This is something his base can get behind — some really big conservative players do not want a long-contracted war that sucks the US into external disputes.Whether this will be the case or not is up for debate, but there is a precedent from Trump's first presidency that we can look to. Iran had attacked several American bases in 2019, as well as attacking Saudi Arabia's most important oil refinery with Iranian drones. There wasn't a huge amount of damage; it was more a symbolic movement and display of capabilities by Iran.Initially, Trump didn't react — it took pressure from Gulf allies like the UAE and Israel for him to respond, which saw him order the assassination of the head of the Iranian Defence Force, Qasem Soleimani. This led to an Iranian response of ‘lots of noise’ and ‘cage rattling’, but minimal real action events, just a few drone attacks. Trump is betting on the same reaction now.If Iran follows the same patterns from the previous engagement, the geopolitical side of this is already at its peak.As of now, Iran is not going after or destroying major Gulf energy capabilities. Nor have there been any disruptions to the shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. In fact, apart from a posturing vote to block the Strait, Iran has not made any indication that it is going to disrupt oil in any way that would lead to price surges.Additionally, despite the U.S. military equipment buildup in the region being its highest since the Iraq war, critical Iranian energy infrastructure is running largely unscathed.This all suggests that the geopolitics and the physical and futures oil markets remain disconnected. Oil will spike on news rumours, but the actual impacts in the physical realm to this point remain low. Of course, this could change in future. But, for now, the risk of seeing oil move to US$100 a barrel is still a minority case rather than the majority.
Quick search
CLOSEThe US Entering the War – What Does It Mean for Oil?

Related Articles
.jpeg)
.jpeg)

Recent Articles

Few companies in modern market history have attracted the level of sustained anticipation surrounding a potential SpaceX public listing.
The IPO Context
For years, traders and investors have watched private funding rounds push the company’s valuation into territory usually associated with major public companies. Each round has raised the same question: when, whether and how does SpaceX, or its Starlink satellite division, finally come to market? It is part of a wider watchlist of major IPO candidates in 2026.
Because major initial public offering (IPO) events do not always move only the company being listed. They can move the assets around them. The SpaceX story is also a useful lens for understanding the mechanics that matter around major listings: private valuation versus public price discovery, institutional allocation versus open market access, lockup schedules, float structure and the risk of a broken IPO when the offer price proves too demanding.
The mistake is to treat a high-profile IPO as a simple popularity contest, or worse, as a crowded trade where attention gets mistaken for execution quality.
Why mega-cap listings can move more than one market
A major public listing does more than create a new tradeable instrument. It changes the reference point for an entire sector. The impact can be supportive or disruptive. A successful listing may validate investor appetite for the sector. A demanding valuation can also drain attention and capital from listed peers as investors compare multiples, growth profiles and liquidity. Both outcomes can occur across different timeframes.
For CFD traders, the relevant question is not simply whether the company is admired. It is whether the listing changes volatility, liquidity, relative valuation or sentiment in instruments already available to trade.
The Valuation Overhang
Private rounds set reference prices, not public market support. In a mega-cap listing, the risk is not whether the company is admired. It is whether the offer price already capitalises the best version of the story. If the first tradeable price cannot absorb that expectation, the IPO can break quickly.
Allocation friction as a volatility catalyst
Institutional investors participate in book-building before the listing. They may receive an allocation at the IPO offer price, subject to demand, syndicate decisions and allocation rules. Public market and CFD participants usually enter after trading begins, at the open market price available on the platform or exchange. That access gap is not merely a disadvantage. It is a source of volatility.
If the offer is heavily oversubscribed and the float is limited, the opening price may gap above the offer price. If demand is weaker than expected, or if the valuation was set aggressively, the opening trade may struggle to hold the IPO price.
Key mechanics that shape IPO trading
Book-building +
The process where investment banks gather demand from institutional investors to help set the offer price.
Why it matters to tradersThe offer price reflects institutional demand before public trading begins. It may differ from the price available once the market opens.
Syndicate allocation +
The distribution of IPO shares among selected institutional investors and eligible participants.
Why it matters to tradersAllocation decisions influence who owns stock at the offer price and how much supply may later reach the open market.
Flotation percentage +
The proportion of the company sold to public investors at listing.
Why it matters to tradersA smaller float can increase scarcity and volatility. A larger float may improve liquidity but may require deeper demand.
Free float +
The shares available for public trading after restricted holdings are excluded.
Why it matters to tradersA low free float can amplify price moves because less stock is available to absorb demand or selling pressure.
Grey market pricing +
Indicative pre-listing pricing in unofficial or conditional markets, where available.
Why it matters to tradersGrey market levels can reveal sentiment before listing, but they are not a guaranteed guide to the opening price.
Indicative price range +
The expected offer price range published before final pricing.
Why it matters to tradersPricing above or below the range can signal demand strength or weakness, but the first public trade remains the key market test.
Stabilisation +
Actions that may be used by underwriters to support orderly trading after listing, subject to rules and disclosure.
Why it matters to tradersStabilisation can affect early price behaviour. Traders should read the offer documents rather than assume the tape is purely organic.
Lockup expiry +
The date when insiders or early investors may be able to sell restricted shares.
Why it matters to tradersIt is a structural supply event. Even a strong listing can face pressure as lockup expiry approaches.
Broken IPO +
A listing that trades below its IPO offer price soon after launch.
Why it matters to tradersIt can signal that the offer valuation was too demanding, market conditions changed or demand was not deep enough.
Valuation overhang +
A situation where a high listing valuation constrains later upside because expectations are already elevated.
Why it matters to tradersStrong companies can still deliver weak trading outcomes if the entry valuation leaves limited room for disappointment.
SpaceX and Starlink as a listing lens
SpaceX is unusual because the broader business spans rocket manufacturing, launch services, satellite internet through Starlink and government or defence-adjacent activity. Those segments can attract different valuation methods, investor bases and risk assumptions.
Starlink has often been discussed as the more likely standalone listing candidate because subscription revenue can be easier for public markets to model than a broader aerospace and launch business. That does not make the valuation simple. Satellite infrastructure is capital intensive, competitive and exposed to regulatory, geopolitical and technology-cycle risks.
For traders, the listing structure matters. A Starlink-only IPO may read more like a communications infrastructure and high-growth technology event. A broader SpaceX listing may be interpreted through aerospace, defence, government contract and frontier technology lenses. The related-market reaction could differ materially depending on which entity, if any, comes to market.
Space economy ecosystem map
SpaceX’s relationship with publicly listed sectors, showing the instruments traders often monitor in response to SpaceX news across launch services, satellite communications, defence contracting and earth observation.
SpaceX (Private Entity)
Launch Competitors
Electron · Neutron (2026 platform deployment system framework)
ULA framework partnership infrastructure · SLS platform development
ULA infrastructure matrix deployment · Orion development systems
Satellite Communications
Mobile satellite broadband connectivity frameworks
LEO voice and specialized programmatic data architectures
Global weather monitoring systems and critical maritime logistics telemetry
Defence Contractors
NASA structural flight operations and primary institutional DoD contracts
Orion modular space platform execution and core weapon systems matrices
Cygnus mission logistics transport frameworks and aerospace production lines
Earth Observation & ETFs
High-cadence programmatic planetary satellite mapping arrays
Broadly diversified index framework track of global aerospace equity allocation
Preparation, scenarios and risk management
The trader’s watchlist
A major IPO event can affect more than the listing itself. Traders may monitor the surrounding market structure through a focused set of instruments and signals.
| Market signal | Why it matters for a SpaceX or Starlink listing |
|---|---|
| Aerospace and satellite communication stocks | Tracks sector validation, competitive repricing and capital rotation across listed space-adjacent names. |
| Nasdaq 100 and US technology sentiment | Frames appetite for high-growth, innovation-led listings. Weak technology sentiment can weigh on demand even when the company narrative is strong. |
| S&P 500 futures and broader US equity tone | Shows whether the listing is arriving into a supportive risk environment or a broader equity drawdown. |
| US dollar index | Helps frame global risk appetite and US dollar-denominated market conditions. A stronger US dollar can coincide with more defensive positioning. |
| US 10-year Treasury yield | Tracks valuation sensitivity. Rising yields can pressure capital-intensive, high-growth listings by discounting future cash flows more heavily. |
| VIX signals and broader volatility conditions | Indicates whether the market is likely to support new issuance or demand a larger valuation discount. |
| Formal filings, roadshow updates and pricing range | Provides the direct event path from speculation to tradeable catalyst. Filing detail, indicative range and final pricing can shape first-day expectations. |
| Comparable IPO performance | Shows how recent high-profile listings have traded after pricing. Useful as context, not as a forecast. |
Historical volatility in space economy stocks around SpaceX events
Average absolute daily percentage moves for RKLB, ASTS and IRDM across three conditions: normal trading days, SpaceX Starship launch days and the following trading day. All three stocks showed materially elevated volatility on or around SpaceX milestones.
| Event | Date | Outcome | Result | RKLB +1d | ASTS +1d | IRDM +1d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFT-1 | Apr 20, 2023 | Explosion at launch pad — vehicle lost 4 min after liftoff | Failure | +6.2% | +8.4% | +2.1% |
| IFT-2 | Nov 18, 2023 | Both stages lost; partial hot-stage separation success | Failure | +3.1% | +5.2% | +0.8% |
| IFT-3 | Mar 14, 2024 | First Starship to reach space; both stages lost on re-entry | Mixed | −1.5% | −2.3% | +0.4% |
| IFT-4 | Jun 6, 2024 | First successful booster splashdown and ship controlled re-entry | Success | −3.8% | −6.1% | −1.9% |
| IFT-5 | Oct 13, 2024 | Booster caught by "chopsticks" launch tower arms — historic milestone | Success | −4.3% | −7.8% | −2.4% |
| IFT-6 | Nov 19, 2024 | Ship successful re-entry; booster failed catch and splashed down in Gulf | Mixed | +2.1% | +1.4% | +0.6% |
What the data shows: All three stocks experienced materially higher volatility on SpaceX Starship launch days compared with normal trading sessions.
ASTS carried the highest absolute daily moves, both in baseline conditions and around events. That may reflect its early-stage, high-growth profile and direct Starlink competition. IRDM was the most stable of the three, although it still showed a wider daily range around SpaceX event days. For CFD traders, wider ranges can increase the effective cost of entry and exit around major events, particularly where spreads also widen.
The launch-event scenario map
These scenarios support conditional thinking before price begins moving quickly.
| If this condition occurs | Traders may monitor | Risk to consider |
|---|---|---|
| An S-1 filing or equivalent document is submitted | Whether related aerospace and technology stocks respond immediately or wait for financial details. | First reactions can be sharp and short-lived. A filing can be faded if valuation or risk disclosures disappoint. |
| The IPO prices above the indicative range | Whether opening-day price action confirms or rejects the aggressive valuation. | High-end pricing can increase the risk of a broken IPO if open-market demand is not deep enough. |
| The floatation percentage is low | Whether scarcity drives a sharp opening move or creates unstable liquidity. | Low free float can amplify upside and downside moves. Spread conditions may deteriorate. |
| The broader equity market is risk-off near listing | Whether institutional demand is strong enough to support the offer price. | Risk-off conditions increase the probability of a weak open, delayed listing or rapid post-open reversal. |
| The lockup expiry approaches after listing | Whether insider selling pressure appears and whether key support levels hold. | Lockup expiry is a structural source of potential supply. It should not be treated as a surprise event. |
| SpaceX or Starlink delays or withdraws plans | Whether pre-event optimism in related names reverses. | Sentiment-driven gains can unwind quickly if the catalyst disappears. |
Execution risk checklist
Use this checklist before making any decision around an IPO-related market event. It is not a trading signal. It is a risk review standard.
Execution Infrastructure: Map these scenarios using GO Markets' integrated TradingView charting, track overlap via the Economic Calendar, and test spread assumptions in a demo environment before committing live capital.
Questions investors are asking
How could a Starlink IPO affect valuation multiples for legacy aerospace and defence names? +
A standalone Starlink listing could give the market a clearer public benchmark for satellite communications and space-linked infrastructure assets. That may influence how investors compare growth rates, revenue visibility, capital intensity and margins across listed peers. The effect would not necessarily be positive for all competitors. A high valuation could lift sector interest, while a weak listing could pressure multiples across related names.
Why does market capitalisation weighting matter after a mega-cap listing? +
If a large new listing becomes eligible for major indices, index methodology can matter. Inclusion rules, free-float adjustments and weighting limits may influence passive demand over time. The timing is not immediate. It depends on index provider rules, eligibility criteria and liquidity. Index inclusion is better treated as a separate lifecycle event, not a guaranteed first-day catalyst.
What is the difference between the IPO offer price and the first tradeable price? +
The IPO offer price is set before public trading through the book-building process. The first tradeable price is the price available once the stock begins trading publicly. Public market and CFD participants may not be able to access the offer price, so the first tradeable level can already reflect institutional allocation, scarcity, sentiment and opening auction dynamics.
Why can a heavily anticipated IPO break below the offer price? +
High demand before listing does not remove valuation risk. A heavily anticipated IPO can break if the offer price is too aggressive, the broader market turns risk-off, the free float is misjudged or early holders sell into the opening demand. A broken IPO does not automatically mean the business is weak. It means the market rejected the price, the timing or both.
How would a Starlink listing differ from a broader SpaceX listing? +
A Starlink-only listing may be assessed through recurring revenue, subscriber growth, infrastructure costs and competition in satellite broadband. A broader SpaceX listing may require a wider framework that includes launch services, government contracts, manufacturing capability, defence-adjacent exposure and long-horizon projects. The relevant peer group and valuation multiples could differ materially.
What to watch from here
The SpaceX IPO narrative is one of the more consequential market stories in the current environment. Whether or not a listing occurs in the near term, the preparation work is similar: understand the listing structure, monitor related instruments, map the scenario framework and define risk controls before the event arrives.
When ready to move from theory to practice, explore GO Markets IPO education resources, platform tools and demo environment to test the process in real market conditions.
.jpeg)
Currency markets in June are being shaped by the re-steepening of the US Treasury yield curve, safe-haven demand and diverging monetary policy paths.
The Federal Reserve remains on a hawkish hold, while the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is managing renewed inflation pressure and the Bank of Japan (BOJ) continues to navigate a wide yield gap against the US. That mix has kept the US dollar supported, left the Japanese yen under pressure, and made AUD/JPY one of the key crosses to watch.
All US release times below are Eastern Time unless stated otherwise.
Quick facts strip
DXY context
Well supported near the 100 level on safe-haven and yield demand
Strongest currency
US dollar (USD), supported by sticky inflation and high yields
Weakest currency
Japanese yen (JPY), pressured by yield divergence and energy import costs
Main central bank theme
Policy divergence as markets reassess rate-cut expectations
Main catalyst ahead
FOMC and BOJ meetings on 16 to 17 June 2026
Leaderboard
Strongest mover: US dollar (USD)
The greenback reasserted its position as a yield and safe-haven asset. The US Dollar Index (DXY) regained the 100 level as inflation and tariff uncertainty kept rate-cut expectations muted.
Key drivers
- Robust growth: Robust economic data, with first-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) expanding at an annual rate of 2.0%
- Sticky inflation: Rebounding inflation, with the consumer price index (CPI) rising to 3.8% in April
- Safe haven: Safe-haven demand linked to Middle East shipping disruption and Strait of Hormuz toll risks
June events to watch
• 5 June, 8:30 am ET | 10:30 pm AEST: Employment Situation, including non-farm payrolls (NFP)
• 10 June, 8:30 am ET | 10:30 pm AEST: CPI
• 16 to 17 June: Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting
• 17 June, 2:00 pm ET | 4:00 am AEST (Next Day): FOMC statement and projections
• 17 June, 2:30 pm ET | 4:30 am AEST (Next Day): Fed Chair press conference
Why it matters
Traders are watching the 17 June FOMC decision for updated projections and guidance on the policy path. The Federal Reserve calendar lists the 16 to 17 June FOMC meeting, with the statement scheduled for 2:00pm ET and the press conference for 2:30pm ET on 17 June. On the downside, any unexpected de-escalation in Middle East tensions could see energy prices fall sharply, which may cool part of the dollar’s inflation premium.
Weakest mover: Japanese yen (JPY)
The yen has faced heavy downward pressure, trading near the closely watched 160 level against the US dollar as the yield gap remains difficult to ignore.
Key drivers
- Yield spread: A wide yield disadvantage against the US dollar
- Import stress: Rising import costs for essential energy and food
- Carry trade: Speculative yen selling as carry traders focus on the rate spread
June events to watch
• 16 to 17 June, Tokyo time: BOJ monetary policy meeting
• 24 June, 8:50 am JST | 9:50 am AEST: Summary of Opinions
Why it matters
Traders are monitoring the risk of direct intervention from Japan’s Ministry of Finance if yen weakness becomes disorderly. The BOJ’s 2026 schedule lists a monetary policy meeting for 16 to 17 June, and notes that Summary of Opinions releases are generally published at 8:50am JST. A surprise shift in BOJ guidance, a rate increase, or a sudden risk-off liquidation in global assets could trigger a short squeeze and drive the yen sharply higher.
Most important cross: AUD/JPY
AUD/JPY remains one of the clearest expressions of yield divergence and energy asymmetry. Australia is a major commodity exporter, while Japan is a large energy importer. That means higher energy prices can create very different macro pressures for each side of the cross.
Key drivers
- Energy split: Higher oil prices may support Australia’s commodity-linked sentiment while increasing Japan’s import burden
- RBA path: RBA policy expectations remain sensitive to domestic inflation and labour market data
- BOJ factors: BOJ policy expectations remain sensitive to yen weakness, imported inflation and official intervention risk
June events to watch
• 16 June, 2:30 pm AEST | 12:30 am ET: RBA monetary policy decision statement
• 16 June, 3:30 pm AEST | 1:30 am ET: RBA Governor media conference
• 16 to 17 June, Tokyo time: BOJ monetary policy meeting
• 24 June, 11:30 am AEST | 9:30 pm ET (Prev. Day): Australia monthly CPI indicator
• 30 June, 11:30 am AEST | 9:30 pm ET (Prev. Day): Minutes of the June RBA Monetary Policy Board meeting
Why it matters
If the RBA keeps a restrictive bias while the BOJ moves cautiously, AUD/JPY could remain supported by carry demand. If the BOJ shifts more hawkishly in June, or if commodity prices such as iron ore weaken sharply, AUD/JPY could face a rapid corrective pullback. That keeps the cross on the watchlist for traders using the GO Markets forex CFDs platform.
The data to watch next
The Bureau of Labor Statistics lists the Employment Situation report, providing the clearest baseline picture of structural US labor market health.
April metrics showed CPI climbing to 3.8%; this updated release serves as a prime indicator for core service stickiness and tariff disruptions.
Wholesale input metrics scheduled for publication by the BLS, tracking the wholesale side of the current sticky inflation environment.
RBA monetary policy decision statement release, followed explicitly by the Governor media conference at 3:30pm AEST to unpack restrictive settings.
A critical central bank cluster. Highlights include the 17 June US policy statement (2:00pm ET) and press conference (2:30pm ET) alongside Tokyo's interest rate spreads.
Key levels and signals
-
◆
DXY 100
A psychological and technical line for USD strength, backed firmly by safe-haven demand and high yields.
-
◆
USD/JPY 160
A closely watched ceiling for potential official intervention risk from Japan's Ministry of Finance if price shifts become disorderly.
-
◆
AUD/USD 0.7202
Near-term resistance if risk sentiment remains constructive and commodity exports demonstrate structural resilience.
-
◆
US 10-year Treasury yield 4.5%
A technical baseline that may increase pressure on equity valuations if sustained, reflecting the broader structural re-steepening of the curve.
Bottom line
Global FX moves in June are set to remain highly sensitive to rate expectations, energy prices and geopolitical developments.
The US dollar’s dual role as a yield and safe-haven currency continues to offer support, while the yen remains exposed to carry demand and intervention risk. AUD/JPY sits at the intersection of those forces, making it one of the cleaner ways to track the policy and energy split across the region.
For traders, the key issue is not only which central bank moves next. It is whether inflation, oil and yields keep moving in the same direction, or whether a policy surprise forces a rapid unwind.
Follow FX through the Asia session
Stay close to Asia-Pacific themes, regional data, sentiment and key crosses.
.jpeg)
The US economy enters June in a complex environment where high interest rates, trade tariff policy and elevated energy prices continue to shape market expectations.
The Federal Reserve’s target range sits at 3.50% to 3.75%, while markets are watching how new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh frames the path ahead. The next Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting on 16 to 17 June could be an important test for rate expectations, especially while Brent crude remains above US$100 per barrel and the US-Iran ceasefire continues to hold.
Fed Funds Rate
3.50% to 3.75%
Next FOMC
16-17 June 2026
Brent Crude
Above US$100/bbl
Key June data events
6 major releases
Growth, business activity and demand
Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 2.0% in the first quarter of 2026, supported by private investment and exports. However, some sectors are feeling the squeeze from trade tariffs and elevated transport costs, which may be starting to weigh on forward order books.
June data to watch
What markets are watching
- Resilience in business investment for advanced technological equipment
- Revisions to consumer spending trends under the “K-shaped” economic divide
- The impact of newly announced Section 122 tariffs on import volumes
- Signs of corporate margin compression in retail and industrial sectors
Why it matters: Stronger-than-expected growth data may support US Treasury yields and the US dollar, potentially keeping pressure on equities. Softer growth data, by contrast, could lower interest rate expectations and weigh on the US dollar, which may support growth-sensitive stocks.
Labour, payrolls and employment data
The US labour market continues to navigate a “low-hire, low-fire” equilibrium. Recent indicators suggest the hiring pace may be slowing as firms adapt to higher financing costs.
June data to watch
What markets are watching
- Whether net payroll additions remain in the 100,000 to 150,000 range
- Movements in the unemployment rate
- Revisions to prior months’ employment data
- Wage growth trends through average hourly earnings
Why it matters: A stronger-than-expected NFP print may lift US Treasury yields and support the US dollar, while capping equity valuation multiples if rate cut expectations move lower. A weaker-than-expected jobs report could weaken the US dollar, lower bond yields and support rate-sensitive assets such as gold.
Inflation, CPI, PPI and PCE
Inflation remains the central market risk. Energy prices, tariffs and services inflation are all feeding into expectations for how long the Fed may need to keep policy restrictive.
June data to watch
What markets are watching
- The PCE price index as the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge
- Second-round effects from elevated fuel costs on core services
- The extent to which tariff-related import costs are passing through to consumer goods
- Business pricing behaviour in the monthly PPI data
Why it matters: Cooling inflation data may lower Treasury yields, weaken the US dollar and support gold and stock indices. Sticky or accelerating inflation could reinforce a higher-for-longer policy stance, which may support the US dollar and pressure Treasuries.
Policy, trade and geopolitics
Trade policy remains a major wildcard. The temporary 10% blanket tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 is scheduled to terminate on 24 July, leaving markets to assess whether temporary surcharges could be replaced by longer-term Section 301 tariffs. That path could influence international supply chains, import costs and corporate margin structures.
June events and themes to monitor
Themes to monitor this month
- Progress of negotiations on Strait of Hormuz shipping protocols
- Congressional debate over the extension of corporate tax cuts
What markets are watching
Markets will be watching whether the Fed leans into inflation control, acknowledges growth risks, or keeps its language deliberately balanced. Policy signals may matter as much as the rate decision itself. If the statement, projections or press conference suggest the Fed is becoming more concerned about inflation persistence, Treasury yields and the US dollar could remain supported. If the Fed gives more weight to slowing activity, rate expectations may move lower.
Key watchlist summary
- Top data point: May CPI on 10 June at 8:30 am ET | 10:30 pm AEST
- Top policy event: FOMC statement on 17 June at 2:00 pm ET | 4:00 am AEST (Next Day)
- Top risk event: Strait of Hormuz transit disruptions
- Wildcard: Section 122 tariff adjustments
- Earnings watch: Late-quarter retail releases
- Key threshold: US 10-year Treasury yield above 4.5%
- Next FOMC: 16 to 17 June 2026
Bottom line
June puts the US market narrative back on inflation, rates and policy credibility. The Fed is not only managing the level of interest rates. It is also managing the market’s confidence that inflation risks from oil, tariffs and wages can stay contained.
For traders, the key issue is whether June data supports the higher-for-longer story, or whether softer growth and labour signals begin to pull expectations in the other direction.

