Notícias de mercado & insights
Mantenha-se à frente dos mercados com insights de especialistas, notícias e análise técnica para orientar suas decisões de negociação.

O mercado de petróleo tem o hábito de parecer estável logo antes de parar de ser liquidado. Essa é a configuração agora.
O tráfego pelo Estreito de Ormuz caiu drasticamente à medida que o conflito em torno do Irã se intensificou, e mais embarcações estão escurecendo ao desligar o AIS, ou Sistema de Identificação Automática, sinais que geralmente mostram para onde os navios estão se movendo. Ormuz não é apenas mais uma rota marítima. É um dos pontos de estrangulamento energéticos mais importantes do mundo; portanto, quando a visibilidade começa a desaparecer, o risco de fornecimento volta ao centro da conversa.
Por que isso importa agora
Isso é importante por alguns motivos.
A mudança da manchete é uma coisa. A implicação do mercado é outra. O petróleo não se trata apenas de quantos barris existem, mas também de saber se esses barris podem se mover, quem está disposto a segurá-los, quanto tempo os compradores estão preparados para esperar e quanto risco extra os comerciantes acham que precisam precificá-los.
No momento, três coisas estão colidindo ao mesmo tempo: navegação interrompida, diplomacia frágil e um mercado que já está fortemente inclinado em uma direção. Essa combinação pode fazer com que o Brent se mova mais rápido do que os fundamentos normalmente sugerem.
O que está impulsionando a mudança
1 A visibilidade do fornecimento está se deteriorando
O primeiro driver é simples. O mercado pode ver menos, e isso tende a deixá-lo mais nervoso.
O trânsito por Ormuz caiu drasticamente, enquanto uma parcela crescente do tráfego envolveu navios que não estão mais transmitindo sinais de rastreamento padrão. Em linguagem simples, menos embarcações estão se movendo normalmente por um corredor crítico e mais atividades estão se tornando mais difíceis de rastrear. Isso não significa automaticamente que o fornecimento está prestes a entrar em colapso. Mas isso significa que a incerteza está aumentando.
2 O buffer de armazenamento do Irã pode ser limitado
O segundo fator é a restrição de exportação e armazenamento do Irã.
A capacidade de armazenamento terrestre é estimada em cerca de 40 milhões de barris, e o mercado está observando o que alguns descrevem como uma linha vermelha de 16 dias. Esse é o ponto em que uma interrupção prolongada nas exportações pode começar a forçar cortes na produção para evitar danos aos reservatórios. Para leitores mais novos, a conclusão é simples. Se o petróleo não puder deixar o armazenamento por tempo suficiente, o problema pode deixar de ser o atraso nas exportações e começar a se tornar um problema genuíno de abastecimento.
3 O posicionamento pode amplificar o movimento
O terceiro fator é o posicionamento, que é apenas uma abreviação do mercado de como os negociadores já estão configurados antes que o próximo movimento aconteça.
Nesse caso, o posicionamento especulativo do petróleo bruto parece fortemente unilateral. Isso é importante porque, quando um mercado está muito inclinado em uma direção, não é preciso muito para desencadear um ajuste brusco. Um novo choque geopolítico pode forçar os comerciantes a agir rapidamente e, uma vez que isso comece, o preço pode subir mais do que as notícias subjacentes por si só poderiam justificar.
Por que o mercado se importa
Um choque de petróleo raramente permanece contido no mercado de energia.
Os preços mais altos do petróleo bruto podem começar a aparecer nas contas de frete, manufatura e energia doméstica. Isso significa que as expectativas de inflação podem começar a subir novamente. Os bancos centrais já estão tentando administrar um equilíbrio difícil entre inflação estável e crescimento mais fraco, então o aumento do petróleo pode dificultar esse trabalho.
E essa não é apenas uma história sobre produtores de petróleo recebendo carona. Companhias aéreas, empresas de transporte e outras empresas sensíveis ao combustível podem ser rapidamente pressionadas quando os custos de energia aumentam. Mercados acionários mais amplos também podem ter que repensar as perspectivas políticas se o petróleo mais alto mantiver a inflação mais firme do que o esperado.
Os efeitos em cascata vão muito além do petróleo.
Há também um ângulo monetário, e é menos simples do que parece à primeira vista.
Moedas vinculadas a commodities, como o dólar australiano, geralmente recebem apoio quando os preços das matérias-primas sobem. Mas essa relação não é automática. Se o petróleo está subindo porque a demanda global está melhorando, isso pode ajudar. Se estiver subindo porque o risco geopolítico está aumentando, os mercados podem passar para o modo de isenção de risco, e isso pode pesar sobre o dólar australiano, mesmo com o aumento dos preços das commodities.
É isso que torna esse tipo de movimento mais interessante do que parece à primeira vista. A mesma alta do petróleo pode apoiar uma parte do mercado e pressionar outra.
Ativos e nomes no quadro
O petróleo Brent continua sendo a leitura mais clara sobre o amplo risco de oferta. Se os traders desejam a expressão mais limpa da manchete, geralmente é aqui que eles olham primeiro.
- ExxonMobil é um dos nomes mais óbvios no quadro. Os preços mais altos do petróleo podem apoiar os preços de venda realizados e a dinâmica dos lucros de curto prazo, embora nunca seja tão simples quanto comprar petróleo, estocar. Custos, mix de produção e sentimentos mais amplos ainda são importantes.
- NextEra Energy adiciona outra camada. Essa história não é apenas sobre combustíveis fósseis. Quando a segurança energética se torna uma preocupação maior, o argumento a favor da resiliência energética doméstica, do investimento na rede e da geração alternativa também pode se fortalecer.
- AUD/USD é outro mercado que vale a pena observar. A Austrália está intimamente ligada aos ciclos de commodities, portanto, preços mais fortes das matérias-primas às vezes podem sustentar a moeda. Mas se os mercados estão reagindo mais ao medo do que ao crescimento, esse vento favorável usual pode não se manter.
Para leitores mais novos, o ponto principal é que os movimentos do petróleo não se espalham pelos mercados em uma linha clara e previsível. Eles se espalham de forma desigual, ajudando alguns ativos, pressionando outros e, às vezes, fazendo as duas coisas ao mesmo tempo.
O que poderia dar errado
Uma narrativa forte não é o mesmo que uma negociação unidirecional.
Um cessar-fogo poderia estabilizar os fluxos marítimos mais rápido do que o esperado. A OPEP+ poderia compensar parte da rigidez elevando a produção. Os dados de demanda da China podem decepcionar, voltando o foco para o consumo fraco, em vez da oferta restrita. E se o prêmio geopolítico diminuir, o petróleo poderá recuar mais rapidamente do que sugere o clima atual.
Para leitores mais novos, a conclusão é simples. Os ralis do petróleo podem ser reais sem serem permanentes. Uma mudança pode ser justificada no curto prazo pelo risco de interrupção e, em seguida, reverter rapidamente se esses riscos diminuírem ou se a demanda diminuir.
O mercado não está mais precificando o petróleo isoladamente. É a visibilidade dos preços, a segurança do transporte e o risco de que a interrupção do fornecimento se espalhe pela inflação, pelas moedas e por um sentimento de risco mais amplo.
É por isso que Ormuz é importante, mesmo para leitores que nunca negociam um barril de petróleo bruto.

If you’re familiar with the US dollar Index, you might have noticed it has moved in a repetitive pattern for the past few years. You need to treat every six months as a cycle, at the end of this cycle (June, December), the Fed will generally raise interest rates. Here’s a look at how this pattern may look: The Cycle Jan-Feb and July-Aug is the adjustment period, and since there is still a half year to go before the end of the cycle, it is unlikely to hold this high position all the time, so investors tend to take the profit and close positions causing the DXY to drop.
The media suggesting that the dollar would fall to 85, I remember this vividly because at the time I spent three or four articles on debating with those who challenged my belief that the USD will go up, not down. In May and November, the price will often soar brutally, not even giving the herd a chance to catch up. June Dec, Fed announces the rate hike, causing the momentum to fizzle and all those previous excuses to maintain the price turn to dust.
This final process completes the end of the cycle. Eight weeks and falling? For the past eight weeks, the USD has held below 95 levels.
Similarly, the US 10-year bond returns cannot break the 3% ceiling. it is it likely that they will fall? At present, there are two reasons why this may occur: There is only one country in the world to raise interest rates which is the USA. All other major countries within the EU, China, and Japan have no plans to raise interest rates.
Although this strategy has the potential to harm the US's opponents in some ways (for example, the Chinese stock market recently dropped dramatically), it doesn't make themselves better off. If the US 10-Year yield does breach upwards of 3%, it may harm all US companies and its domestic economy. Therefore, keeping the return around 3%, but not breaking it, seems a better option.
The recent decline in CNY seems like a deliberate attempt by China to employ counteractive measures against the US's trade war. The devaluation of CNY has numerous benefits. For example, it can offset the domestic exceeded hot money, create inflation to dilute debts, make export goods cheaper, offset the tariffs brought by trade wars, and so on.
US vs. China Ultimately, the manipulation of monetary policies has both positive and negative effects and deciding who may win a trade war between the US and China is too hard to call. We will wait and see.
This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions. Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk.
Lanson Chen GO Markets Analyst

Deal or No Deal Brexit negotiations have been ongoing for some months now, and even while officials state that ‘sufficient progress’ in the talks has been made, the public are still unaware of what the details of said progress are. This week Theresa May was in Brussels and it was expected that here a deal would be agreed upon, with key issues worked out before talks would then move to trade and transition. However, a deal was not settled, as the Democratic Unionist Party did not agree with the proposed deal after discovering it would prevent Northern Ireland from leaving the European Union on the same terms as the rest of the United Kingdom.
What happens next? As a deal was not agreed, time is running out before the European Council meeting, which is to be held on December 14 th -15 th. Theresa May will be hoping a deal can be made before the meeting and will be returning to Brussels at some point this week to push a deal through.
It looks like the main issue is the Irish border between Ireland and Northern Ireland; no one wants a hard border between the two nations, as it would undermine the 1998 peace accord that ended 30 years of violence in the region, making it vital a deal is agreed on the matter. If not, it will hard to see Brexit talks moving to the next phase. A transition deal should be made by October 2018; if not, the United Kingdom may crash out of the European Union without a deal – a disastrous scenario.
Financial Markets It was highly anticipated a deal would be agreed between the two sides this week and we saw the Pound leaping higher against the major currencies. However, as the news of a no deal broke out, we saw the Pound drop against the US Dollar and the Euro. However, the Pound is up at around 10% against the US Dollar since beginning of 2017 but further development will certainly influence the Cable.
GBPUSD: Source: GO Markets MT4 The Euro strengthened against the Pound when the news came out, which has caused more uncertainty around the matter. The Euro is up by around 21% against the Pound since January and we could see more gains for the Euro as the UK economy keeps outperforming in the coming months. EURGBP Source: GO Markets MT4 As the Pound fell, we saw the FTSE100 jump higher as a weak Pound boosts the earnings for London listed companies with international profits.
The Index is up 3% since the start of the year. FTSE100 Source: GO Markets MT4

City of London Feeling the Brexit Effect Not a day goes by without Brexit being mentioned and we can expect more of this to continue for some time, even after Britain leaves the European Union next year. With the International Monetary Fund (IMF) cutting its economic growth forecast for Britain for the coming years, are we also starting to see the impact of it on the City of London – the biggest financial centre in the world? Morgan McKinley has shown that the number of jobs available in December 2017 fell by around 52% month-to-month, a much bigger decline compared to the 30% drop seen over the same periods in 2015 and 2016. “In December, the city is abuzz with holiday parties, not hiring, so a drop is to be expected, but for it to be such a seismic drop is alarming” said Hakan Enver, the operations director for financial services for Morgan McKinley.
Year-on-year we have seen 37% fall in vacancies which is a completely different picture to when we look at figures in 2015 and 2016 when we saw a 16% increase in job openings. A recent survey by account firm Binder Dijker Otte (BDO) has shown that the United Kingdom has dropped out of the ranking for top six countries for potential migrants from the European Union. Paul Eagland, managing partner at BDO said the government must act to secure the UK’s access to talent: “UK businesses are already struggling with a skills shortage.
The impact of the EU referendum and uncertainty around a new trade deal is likely to make this worse.” “It’s absolutely imperative that the Government makes it clear to the world that the UK is still a great place to do business and that we continue to attract the world’s brightest and best to our country”. UK’s former immigration minister, Brandon Lewis, said that the issue of skilled worker visas was up by 38% but that is unlikely to make up the difference. Mr Enver said: “On the one hand, it’s great that the UK is still being considered an attractive destination from countries outside of the EU.” “However, on the other hand, there are signs that European employees are becoming less captivated by the draw of working in this country.” “2017 was the year we were told we’d have an exit strategy and a transition plan.
We have neither. “As new rounds of talks kick off, let’s hope 2018 brings the much-needed clarity and stability everyone’s waiting for.” A challenging time for the financial sector in Britain.

The US official trade deficit number with China is $375.2bn in 2017. But According to China Customs General Administration, this number should be $275.8bn. Notice there is a vast gap between the versions from two sides.
So, which version is closer to the facts? Firstly, let’s start this debate by looking at the US perspective. Previously in the 1990s and early 2000s, most of the imports from China were low-value, labor-intensive products such as toys, clothes, footwear, etc.
And even now, China are still producing these kinds of products. However, over the past decade, an increasing proportion of US imports from China are more technologically advanced products (US calls it ATP). From the table below, we can see that, among the top 5 categories of import products, three of them are ATP by the US’s definition.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. imports of ATP from China in 2017 totaled $171.1 billion. Information and communications products (i.e., Phones and Pads) were by far the most significant U.S.
ATP import from China, accounting for 91% of U.S. ATP imports from China and 60% of U.S. global imports of this category (see table below). This would generally go against common sense, right?
Let me explain. As we all know, Apple is the largest company in the world to produce mobile phones and IPads, and the second largest is Samsung, which is a Korean company. Although Huawei is the third largest mobile phones producer, the US government entirely banned Huawei from entering the US market due to “national security” reasons.
So how did phones and pads become the largest category that the US imported from the Chinese? An explanation from China's point of view helps reveal this mystery. Firstly, there are two terms that we learned in Economics 101, Finished Product and Intermediate goods.
An intermediate good is a product used to produce a finished product. For example, in the case of producing an iPhone, Chinese factories contribute only 6% of the components (which is Assembly). All the other significant parts such as Hardware, Touchscreen& Glass, Battery, etc. these typically come from other countries such as South Korea and Japan.
If we take all those parts which come from Korea & Japan out of the US/China Trade Balance, the trade deficit will decrease one-third straight away. Below is a breakdown of the costs for various components of an average iPhone. Moreover, when an iPhone finished assembly and shipped and sold to US customers, it was Apple, a US company, who earned most of the profits, not Chinese assembly factories.
However, just because the assembly is the last step of the manufacturing process, and the phones did “shipped from China to the US,” the US government defined this as “imports from China.” Based on this knowledge, it appears the US might be deliberately twisting the terminology to fool the general public, helping to fuel the current dispute against China. There are hundreds more similar examples like this. These include iPhone, Dell who assembles their laptops in Shanghai, Boeing who assembles their planes in Tianjin, and most recently, Elon Musk who announced that he wants to open an assembly factory in Shanghai.
In conclusion, the US government seems to be exaggerating the trade deficit figures to help justify starting a trade war with China. This idea may sound like a conspiracy, but when you consider the many influential world powers throughout history who have leveraged their strength and resources to suppress their competitors, it makes more sense. Particularly those deemed to be in second place.
Think about the cold war between the US and Soviet Union; it just passed not too long ago. Lanson Chen GO Markets Analyst This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions.
Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk. Sources: USCITC DataWeb, US Census Bureau, Teardown.com

Central Bank Interest Rates By Klavs Valters A central bank's interest rate is a rate at which it typically lends money to local banks. This interest rate is charged by nations’ central or federal banks on loan advances to control the money supply in the economy and the banking sector. Each central bank has its own annual schedule when announcing its rates.
In the trading world, it's prudent to keep a tab on these announcements as it impacts market volatility if there is a sudden interest rate rise or fall. These rates also have an impact on everyday life, as they often determine what you pay for borrowing money, as well as what the bank will pay you for saving money. Recent Rate Hikes The most recent rate hike came from the US Federal Reserve back in March 2018, when it increased its rates from 1.5% to 1.75%.
Additionally, the Federal Reserve also signalled its intention to further raise this rate in the future. This has been the sixth time the US Federal Reserve has raised its interest rates since the 2008 financial crisis. Bank of Canada increased its key interest rates back in January by 0.25% to 1.25% while quoting a number of upbeat news stories, including an economy that is running flat-out, healthy job gains, and the lowest unemployment rate in over 40 years.
This has been Bank of Canada's third rate hike since the summer of 2017, and the first time the overnight rate has been above 1% since 2009. Current Bank Interest Rates Central Bank Interest Rate Announcement Timetable for 2018 To keep up to date with other news announcements, visit our ‘Economic Calendar’ section on our website - https://www.gomarkets.com/au/economic-calendar/

As Brexit concerns continue to weigh heavy on Pound Sterling crosses, there's not much to discuss from a technical perspective. Evidence of an overall bearishness sentiment dominates the charts with a few corrective moves thrown in for good measure. However, sifting through the layers of Sterling sameness, I uncovered something interesting relating to the GBPJPY, which might provide some trading opportunities longer-term.
First, taking a look at a daily chart above, notice we are hovering around the same price region as we were in August last year. Could this mean the pair is due for a change in direction? Perhaps.
What I find more intriguing is that for the past five years, August has been predominantly bearish for the GBPJPY pair when compared to other months. This seasonality chart from Bloomberg shows this more clearly. So how does this relate to longer-term trading opportunities?
If we are to believe that August is typically a bearish month, then we would be naturally inclined to seek short trades, and according to the point and figure chart below, I think I may have found one. Keep in mind that the seasonality data also suggests recoveries into December so we would need to trade with care. The bearish resistance line suggests we are currently in a downtrend with an increase in supply triggering a bearish trade signal as the price broke through the triple bottom support at 144.50.
At present, I am watching two downside targets should the fall in price exacerbate. These levels are located at 140.00 and 136.00 respectively. Alternatively, any upside move will need to re-test the 144.50 area which should act as resistance and also a rally above 146.00 to consider revising the overall trend.
Finally, if we study the short-term price action above on the hourly chart, it would seem the 100 Day Moving Average line in blue is helping to cap any bullish activity. The only time it has successfully managed to punch above the 100 MA this month has been to test the weekly pivot lines in black. If you are interested in other GBP analysis, I recently posted an article on GBPAUD here which I believe is another potential long-term opportunity.
For both these ideas, much will depend on Brexit certainty and how global trade talks progress in the coming weeks. By Adam Taylor CFTe This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions.
Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk. Sources: Tradingview, Bloomberg
